Open-source News

David Airlie has submitted the Direct Rendering Manager (DRM) driver updates for the Linux 5.18 kernel that includes the many graphics/display driver changes this cycle...

Linux 5.18 Graphics Driver Changes From FreeSync Video Mode To New Intel Hardware  Phoronix

The crypto subsystem updates have landed in the Linux 5.18 kernel...

Top 6 Linux Distributions for KDE Plasma 5 of 2022  BollyInside

A guide to implementing DevSecOps Will Kelly Thu, 03/24/2022 - 03:01 Up Register or Login to like.

DevSecOps adoption offers your enterprise improved security, compliance, and even competitive advantages as it faces new threat vectors, a new world of work, and demanding customers. It's only a matter of time before DevSecOps subsumes DevOps because it offers the same core practices but adds a security focus to each phase of the development lifecycle.

In this new eBook, I take a phased approach to DevSecOps transformation. While the eBook targets readers already familiar with DevOps practices, you can still use it to chart your course from a legacy software development life cycle (SDLC) straight to DevSecOps.

More DevOps resources What is DevOps? The ultimate DevOps hiring guide DevOps monitoring tools guide A guide to implementing DevSecOps Download the DevOps glossary eBook: Ansible for DevOps Latest DevOps articles Getting to know DevSecOps

DevSecOps incorporates security in every stage of the cycle while preserving the best qualities of DevOps. It knocks down the silos between your development, security, and operations teams. Benefits of DevSecOps include:

• Prevention of security incidents before they happen: By integrating DevSecOps within your CI/CD toolchain, you help your teams detect and resolve issues before they occur in production.
• Faster response to security issues: DevSecOps increases your security focus through continuous assessments while giving you actionable data to make informed decisions about the security posture of apps in development and whether they are ready to enter production.
• Accelerated feature velocity: DevSecOps teams have the data and tools to mitigate unforeseen risks better.
• Lower security budget: DevSecOps enables streamlined resources, solutions, and processes, simplifying the development lifecycle.

This eBook breaks down the DevOps and DevSecOps transformation into a framework your enterprise can follow to integrate more security into CI/CD pipelines and the organizational culture.

Embracing the DevOps to DevSecOps transformation

Moving from DevOps to DevSecOps is a fundamental transformation for your entire organization. DevSecOps will change your culture as continuous feedback, team autonomy, and training promote a new way of working for your technical staff.

In fact, you also should account for non-coders such as your sales and marketing teams in your transformation, as DevSecOps provides stakeholders with even more data and reporting than you could offer them with DevOps. For example, a move to DevSecOps enables your salespeople to tell a powerful security and compliance story.

While you may have introduced automation through your DevOps journey, a DevSecOps transformation takes it up a notch. You'll need to bring your culture along with that change. The developers, cybersecurity specialists, and stakeholders will feel the changes from the increased automation that comes from the DevSecOps transformation.

This eBook also walks you through a DevSecOps maturity model that provides another way to chart your organization's journey. Like DevOps, DevSecOps brings a need for collaboration and iteration to continuously improve your tools and processes.

Start your DevSecOps transformation now

Get started on your DevOps to DevSecOps transformation with this new eBook. Face your DevSecOps shift with confidence as your organization's processes mature. In addition to this eBook, Opensource.com has published several informative articles about DevOps and DevSecOps practices that provide additional insights and learning.

Download now: A guide to implementing DevSecOps

This downloadable guide helps you chart a course through your organization's DevOps to DevSecOps transformation.

DevOps Security and privacy What to read next This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International License. Register or Login to post a comment.

Arduino Pro Portenta X8 is a tiny, Linux-ready single-board computer  Liliputing

Making the case for openness as the engine of human progress Brook Manville Thu, 03/24/2022 - 03:00 Up 1 reader likes this

Opensource.com readers might feel tempted to shrug off Johan Norberg's recent book, Open: The Story of Human Progress, as just one more sermon preached to a choir of devoted believers. But while the sermon offers some familiar themes, this new work deserves serious new attention.

It's an ambitious manifesto, reaching for global scale, arguing that the future progress of the whole world now depends, existentially, on nations' and societies' embrace of open practices. The call is also particularly timely: 1990s-era optimism about burgeoning openness in Western societies is today ceding to a more pessimistic reality. Recent commentators seem to echo George Will, who said September 11, 2001 marked "the end of our holiday from history."

Open Organization resources Download resources Join the community What is an open organization? How open is your organization?

To which Norberg seems to implicitly answer: "And because of that, more than ever, the world now needs more 'open.'"

In this review, I want to offer only a brief outline for Norberg's argument about the importance of openness today. I don't aim to be comprehensive; instead, I wish to summarize only as much of the book as is necessary for explaining the questions I feel it raises—not only for me, but also, I suspect, for anyone interested in the ongoing, global conversation about "open" principles and practices today.

"The power of open"—throughout history and into the future

Norberg's argument is quietly polemical and unfolds slowly. But the winding road he paves allows him to argue repeatedly that adoption of greater "openness" by various communities or states through time—openness to ideas, innovations, and improvements (whether borrowed, traded, or imported through immigration)—best explains why history's "winners" went on to flourish. Similarly, his case discussions counter-argue that when these winners started to retreat from openness (in different ways), their progress slowed or halted.

The second half of the book ("Closed") draws from a range of landmark sociopsychological research, from which Norberg constructs an explanation of why humans, despite a penchant for learning from the good ideas of others, also backslide into competitive and adversarial tribal loyalty. We are, Norberg illustrates, maddeningly capable of both win-win collaboration with others but also zero-sum warfare and mutual destruction, often with those same "others." This central dilemma of human nature, he suggests, must somehow be resolved to establish more openness all around, even though managing openness is more difficult and often imprecise.

His final chapters offer various suggestions for tilting zero-sum advocates away from destructive and closed tribal thinking. Pushing for greater openness all the time, the author suggests, may have short term costs for those who dare, but will ultimately deliver longer-term progress for them—and indeed human civilization more broadly. If today's civilization fails in this, he repeatedly warns, we have only our collective selves to blame for the grinding decline that awaits.

It's always more complicated

This is a thought-provoking book, but embracing its pitch requires several leaps of faith.

The first part of Norberg's thesis—that the lessons of yesterday's civilizations demonstrate that all human progress has come from the energetic pursuit of "open"—launches on soaring wings over historical landscapes inevitably more complicated than Norberg suggests (Ron McFarland notes this, too, in his review of the book). A host of PhD dissertations could test his flurry of propositions about this pivotal point of world history. Each of his case examples might be (and through the years have been) plausibly interpreted with differing explanations.

To highlight just a few:

• Norberg argues that the floreat of ancient Greece can be linked to its invention of "open" rationality and science, coupled with inter-city state exchange and debate. But the Greek poleis were by no means all democracies or given to such values, and much of their history was defined by destructive (i.e., zero-sum) wars with one another. And even the Greek jewel of openness—5th C. BCE Athens, in the age of Pericles—was also famous for progressively tightening its citizenship during the same era, and imposing multiple barriers against growing immigration. It was less open than contemporary speeches might suggest.
• Turning to Rome, Norberg stresses that the power and success of its empire stemmed from ongoing acquisition (via trade and conquest) and then application of the ideas of other peoples from across its domains. But he glosses over the notion that Rome's public-spirited culture and citizenship of Res Publica developed in opposition to its early enemies.
• Next to Britain: Norberg links the country's 18th-19th C. industrial revolution to adaptation of Dutch financial innovations and the creativity of immigrant Jews and Huguenots, but it also gives short shrift to the formative dynamic of its centuries-long wars with, and efforts to distinguish the nation from, France and its more statist approach to the economy.
• And finally to America, which Norberg argues owes much to its early embrace of immigration, freedom of religion, and intercultural exchange, though he tends to downplay the country's very non-open approach to embedding slavery in its founding.

None of these objections should destroy belief in the value of open innovation for creating progress in a given civilization (or nation, or organization). But we should always remember that events are more complicated than our stories often attest.

An equation with two unknowns

So greater openness leads to greater progress, says Norberg. And yet a statement this simple becomes more complicated when readers reflect on precisely how the author defines both "open" and "progress." Students of algebra know the fundamental conundrum of solving an equation with two unknowns. Norberg's book rests upon a similar conundrum.

Let's unpack it. First, how exactly are we to understand progress?

Norberg might reasonably claim that traditionally-perceived "great" civilizations he explores—e.g., classical Greece (6th-4thth C. BCE), ancient Rome empire (31 BCE-476 AD), China's Song dynasty (960-1279 AD), Britain in the age of Industrial Revolution (18th-19th C.)—are self-evident laudable embodiments of what "progress" is. But in also applauding the open innovation practices of the 13th C. Mongolian king, Genghis Kahn, Norberg seems to imply that we should similarly admire the legacies of a leader known for his armies' terrifying conquests and passion for revenge (but in fairness, also for certain accomplishments in statecraft, Eurasian commerce, and religious tolerance). On the other side of the coin, Norberg paints the Catholic Church as a historical force of progress-destroying hierarchy and closure. But he also ignores its role in unifying much of Western civilization and preserving so much of its cultural legacy for subsequent generations.

Students of algebra know the fundamental conundrum of solving an equation with two unknowns. Norberg's book rests upon a similar conundrum.

We should acknowledge, of course, that all the civilizations Norberg features in Open had both inspiring and repugnant features, and even those judged on balance today as "morally bad" may have contributed certain things, born of cross-boundary innovation, to the "greater good" of later humankind. So in celebrating the contributions of "open," then, how should we define and judge the nature of progress per se? Norberg fails to firmly assert exactly what his "pursuit of open" actually aims for. In the simplest terms, it seems to be whatever (supposedly well-understood) value for the world can be seen in this or that legendary civilization of the past.

And Norberg's treatment of "open" is similarly ambiguous. But at least this concept becomes a little clearer as the book unfolds.

Norberg never offers a concise, summary definition of his book's eponymous concept; instead, he plots plenty of dots that readers must connect into a general outline of what "open" means to him. Overall, by my own reading of his story, "open" signifies communities, organizations, or societies that are:

• inviting of new ideas from others, gathered or created as a result of trade, exchange, cross-boundary collaboration or arrival and integration of newcomers, and 
• sustained by tolerance of diversity and dissent, inclusiveness, free-flowing debate, large (or at least selected) degrees of individual liberty, and avoidance (if not prohibition against) tribal enmity and destructive rivalry based on group identities or fear-inducing hierarchies of power

For Norberg, an all-important concept captured in a single word sits atop a host of interconnected conditions and attributes.

What gets in the way

Norberg's acute insights into individual and group behaviors make the second part of the book more distinctive than the first.

The author outlines the dilemma of human collaboration, the successes of which can so quickly turn into suspicions of others, and the failures of which can create fear and enmity. He demonstrates how our competitiveness and zeal for affiliation encourages us to continuously divide the world into "us" and "them," even when "they" have good ideas that we freely borrow and benefit from. Norberg similarly explains how our laudable desire to win too often forces us to push for zero-sum victory, when objective assessment regularly shows that win-win partnerships with would-be opponents deliver more value for all. 

In another illuminating section, the author explains why humans tend to falsely romanticize bygone days—because we conveniently minimize past problems and exaggerate new looming challenges, thus steering us away from future opportunities and new sources of potential innovation. Comparable research also shows that, in times of threat or instability, a powerful part of our brain starts to crave the security of control—and then we trade personal liberty and respect for others for the controlling and often abusive protection of powerful hierarchical leaders.

All such impulses make us less trusting of—and less willing to invest or take risks in—"open."

Open makes lively reading and is rich with insights about the human foibles and behaviors that so often hinder human progress, even if it disappoints when it leaves so much unexplored. Closing time

Regrettably, Norberg's shrewd analysis of why humans so easily abandon opening up doesn't culminate with many concrete suggestions for restraining or converting our closed-leaning impulses and behaviors. 

The ideas and principles he advances are all reasonable (some research-based, others reflective of the author's personal experiences), but they only hint at any kind of scalable institutional transformation. Here are some highlights:

• Norberg vaguely asserts that societies or other entities aspiring to enduring openness must build cross-cutting identities to break down tribal enmities; encourage their member's empathy for "others" of "out-groups" by constructive use of literature, art and mass communications; and expand trade to build ideas of "mutual usefulness" among nations, instead of war (which motivated formation of the European Union after World War II).
• Norberg similarly attacks the costs of "zero-sum" economics and the thinking underpinning it, describing how and why (over time) zero-sum policies have created more closed societies. But here again, he offers little concrete suggestions for scalable prevention.
• Norberg critiques the (misguided, in his view) embrace of nostalgia for bygone better times (which were really not better, as he shows), calling instead for new systems that increase people's awareness of future threats (e.g., global warming) and provide incentives for populations to volunteer their best ideas for how to deal with them.

So in the end, while Norberg's historically informed vision for a more open future is bold, his practical suggestions for bringing about that future and translating it to today's world are decidedly less so. Open makes lively reading and is rich with insights about the human foibles and behaviors that so often hinder human progress, even if it disappoints when it leaves so much unexplored. Anyone working through its pages will be forced to think more deeply about what is surely a major—even if not the only—explanation for the progress and success of nations and civilizations.

And it will also push every reader to ponder what can be done today, to promote more openness towards such desirable ends. In the second part of this review, I will explore some of the future-facing questions it raised for me.

Is "open" the future of human progress, as this recent book argues? Maybe. To know for sure, we'll need to clearly define it—and the purposes it serves.

Image by:

Opensource.com

The Open Organization Read this next Open exchange, open doors, open minds: A recipe for global progress This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International License. Register or Login to post a comment.

Linux Operating System Market Size, Analysis By Segmentation And Geography Overview  openPR

Opera 85 for Windows, macOS and Linux is offered  Tech Gaming Report

IoT and Blockchain Market Maximum Benefit and Growth Potential of Key Players 2028: Amazon, Iotex, Filament, The Linux Foundation, Cisco Systems – ChattTenn Sports  ChattTenn Sports

The post Best Linux Distributions for Scientists and IT Professionals first appeared on Tecmint: Linux Howtos, Tutorials & Guides .

In the world of Linux distributions, there are categories that have served their purpose to the benefit of everyone in the open-source community. One of the bigger advantages when it comes to using Linux

The post Best Linux Distributions for Scientists and IT Professionals first appeared on Tecmint: Linux Howtos, Tutorials & Guides.

It was just back in 2018 that Andes' NDS32 CPU architecture support was added with the Linux 4.17 kernel. But now with Linux 5.18 the AndesCore NDS32 architecture is being removed over lack of active maintenance...

Andes NDS32 CPU Architecture To Be Dropped In Linux 5.18  Phoronix

How to Install the Brave Browser on Linux  MUO - MakeUseOf

AMD continues improving their Error Detection And Dorrection (EDAC) driver code within the Linux kernel ahead of next-generation processors debuting later this year...

Forget TweetDeck, This Open-Source App Is A Better Twitter Experience  Forbes

One of the most beautiful and user friendly Linux distributions gets even better  TechRepublic

GNOME 42 Linux DE is here with new dark mode, improved screenshotting, and more  BetaNews

Register for the ELISA Spring Workshop on April 5-7 to Learn More

SAN FRANCISCO – March 23, 2022 –  Today, the ELISA (Enabling Linux in Safety Applications) Project, an open source initiative that aims to create a shared set of tools and processes to help companies build and certify Linux-based safety-critical applications and systems, announced a stronger ecosystem focused on automotive use cases with the addition of the Automotive Intelligence and Control of China (AICC), LOTUS Cars and ZTE.

“The ELISA ecosystem continues to grow globally with strong support from automakers across Asia and Europe,” Kate Stewart, Vice President of Dependable Embedded Systems at The Linux Foundation. “By leveraging the expertise of current and new ELISA Project members, we are defining the best practices for use of Linux in the automobiles of the future. “

Linux is used in all major industries because it can enable faster time to market for new features and take advantage of the quality of the code development processes. Launched in February 2019 by the Linux Foundation, ELISA works with Linux kernel and safety communities to agree on what should be considered when Linux is to  be used in safety-critical systems. The project has several dedicated working groups that focus on providing resources for System integrators to apply and use to analyze qualitatively and quantitatively on their systems.

The Automotive Working Group discusses the conditions and prerequisites the automotive sector needs to integrate Linux into a safety critical system. The group, which includes collaboration from ADIT, Arm, Codethink, Evidence (a part of Huawei), Red Hat and Toyota, focuses on actual use cases from the Automotive domain to derive the technical requirements to the kernel as a basis for investigation within the Architecture Workgroup and to serve as a blueprint for actual projects in the future. There is also close collaboration with Automotive Grade Linux, which results in a meta-ELISA layer enhancing the instrument cluster demo for safety relevant parts. As leaders in the automotive industry, AICC, LOTUS Cars and ZTE will most likely join the Automotive Working Group.

New Global Automotive Expertise

As the industry’s leading ICV computing infrastructure company, AICC is committed to providing OEMs with intelligent vehicle computing platforms and digital bases for empowering them the differentiated application development ability. In November 2021, AICC released iVBB2.0 series products, which takes ICVOS as the core product, then develops ICVHW, ICVSEC, ICVEC, and other product units. Currently, iVBB2.0 has been delivered to many OEMs and achieved collaboration on cross-platform development, co-built SDV, multi-chip distributed deployment, data security policy deployment and car cloud collaborative computing.

“Becoming a member of the ELISA Project, is in line with the high real-time, high-security, and high-reliability commitment that AICC has always made,” said Dr. Jin Shang, CEO & CTO of AICC. “This will provide a guarantee for the mass production development of AICC’s ICV computing infrastructure platform from security and quality perspectives. Based on the elements, tools, and processes shared by ELISA, AICC will build safety-critical applications and systems relating to Linux requirements, leading to widely used and internationally influential products.”

LOTUS Cars, which was honored as “Manufacturer of the Year” at the News UK Motor Awards in 2021, is focused on the safety of intelligent driving. It is a world-famous manufacturer of sports cars and racing cars noted for their light weight and fine handling characteristics.

“Functional safety is critical to intelligent driving,” said Jie Deng, LOTUS Cars In-Vehicle Operating System Lead. “LOTUS focuses on ‘track-level intelligent drive‘ and is committed to ensuring that drivers stay away from risks through active redundancy of software and hardware. We are very excited to join the ELISA Project and work with industry experts to productize Linux-based safety-critical systems for more drivers to experience intelligent driving in a highly safe and fun way.”

ZTE Corporation is a global leader in telecommunications and information technology.  Founded in 1985, the company has been committed to providing innovative technologies and integrated solutions for operators, government and consumers from over 160 countries. ZTE has established 11 state-of-the-art global R&D centers and 5 intelligent manufacturing bases.

Relying on key technologies and core capabilities in the communications field, ZTE Automotive Electronics is committed to becoming a digital vehicle infrastructure capability provider and an independent high-performance partner in China, facilitating the intelligent and networked development in the automobile field. ZTE has been dedicated to GoldenOS R&D for more than 20 years. On this basis, ZTE proposes the integrated automotive operating system solution of high-performance embedded Linux and high security microkernel OS/Hypervisor, covering all scenarios of intelligent vehicle control, intelligent driving, intelligent cockpit and intelligent network connectivities.

These new members join ADIT, AISIN AW CO., Arm, Automotive Grade Linux, Banma, BMW Car IT GmbH, Codethink, Elektrobit, Horizon Robotics, Huawei Technologies, Intel, Toyota, Kuka, Linuxtronix. Mentor, NVIDIA, SUSE, Suzuki, Wind River, OTH Regensburg and Toyota.

The Spring Workshop

ELISA Project members will come together for its quarterly Spring Workshop on April 5-7 to learn about the latest developments, working group updates, share best practices and collaborate to drive rapid innovation across the industry. Hosted online, this workshop is free and open to the public. Details and registration information can be found here.

Workshop highlights include:

• A keynote by Robert Martin, Senior Principal Engineer at MITRE Corporation, about “Software Supply Chain Integrity Transparency & Trustworthiness and Related Community Efforts.” The presentation will discuss the capabilities emerging across industry and government to assess and address the challenges to providing trustworthy software supplies with assurance of integrity and transparency to their composition, source, and veracity – the building blocks of software supply chains we can gain justifiable confidence in at scale and speed.
• A session by Christopher Temple, Lead Safety & Reliability Systems Architect at Arm Germany GmbH, and Paul Albertella, Consultant at Codethink, about “Mixed-Criticality Processing on Linux.” This talk will help create a common understanding of mixed-criticality processing on Linux and the related problems, collect and discuss alternatives for addressing the problems.
• A discussion led by Philipp Ahmann, Business Development Manager at Robert Bosch GmbH, about a new Industrial IoT (IIoT) Working Group within ELISA. The open forum will allow the community to discuss framing lightweight SOUP safety standards, but focusing on those touch points which are not fully covered by other use case driven working groups.

Speakers include thought leaders from ADIT GmbH, Arm, Bosch GmbH, Bytedance, Codethink, Huawei, Mobileye, The Linux Foundation, MITRE Corporation and Red Hat. Check out the schedule and register to attend the workshop today.

For more information about ELISA, visit https://elisa.tech/.

About The Linux Foundation

The Linux Foundation is the organization of choice for the world’s top developers and companies to build ecosystems that accelerate open technology development and commercial adoption. Together with the worldwide open source community, it is solving the hardest technology problems by creating the largest shared technology investment in history. Founded in 2000, The Linux Foundation today provides tools, training and events to scale any open source project, which together deliver an economic impact not achievable by any one company. More information can be found at www.linuxfoundation.org.

The Linux Foundation has registered trademarks and uses trademarks. For a list of trademarks of The Linux Foundation, please see its trademark usage page: www.linuxfoundation.org/trademark-usage. Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds.

###

The post The ELISA Project Strengthens its Focus on Automotive Use Cases with Expertise from New Members Automotive Intelligence and Control of China, LOTUS Cars and ZTE appeared first on Linux Foundation.

In addition to the Imagination PowerVR Series 1 code drop of their late 90's era driver code, Imagination Tech has managed to successfully land its new PowerVR Rogue "PVR" Vulkan driver in time for Mesa 22.1's release next quarter...